PAPER REVIEW FORM

IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Network, IEEE Wireless Communications
PAPER REVIEW FORM

Title of Paper_________________________________________________________

Author(s) _____________________________________________________________

Name of Reviewer_______________________________________________________

Address_____________________________________________________________

Tel/Fax/E-mail______________________________________________________

Magazine Liaison Editor/Guest Editor___________________________________

Address_____________________________________________________________

Tel/Fax/E-mail______________________________________________________

Date Sent_________________________________

Date To Be Returned_______________________________

Reviewer: Please complete Sections I, II, and III. Thank you for your assistance.

 

I. Summary and Recommendation

Summary of Evaluation:

Award Quality____ Excellent____ Good____ Fair____ Poor____

Recommendation:

Accept With No Changes____

Accept If Minor Revision(s) Is Made (see Section III)____

Major Revision(s) Required (see Section III) Followed by Second Review____

Reject (see Section III)____

Signature of Reviewer________________________Date_____________________

 

Title of Paper_________________________________________________________

Author(s) _____________________________________________________________

II. Overview

Reader Interest:


Is this a tutorial paper with minimum mathematical content?


Yes____Partially____No____

Within its field of specialization, is the topic important?

Yes____Moderately____No____

Is the paper of current interest to the Magazine's readership?

Yes____Perhaps____No____

How is this interest likely to change over the next five years?

Grow____Remain Static____Diminish____

Content:

Is the paper technically sound?

Yes____Partially____No____(see Section III)

Does the paper discuss new and/or unpublished work?

Yes____ Don't Know____ No____

If so, is the new or unpublished work significant or do you believe that all reference to
this treatment will vanish within two years?

Yes____ No____

Format and Presentation:

Is the paper 4500 words or less?

Yes____ No____

Are there six or fewer charts and figures?

Yes____No____

Are there ten or fewer references?

Yes____No____

How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?

Good____Could be Improved (see Section III)____Poor____(see Section III)

How readable is the paper for an average ComSoc reader?

Readable____Effort Required____Difficult____Unreadable____

III. Comments and Suggestions

Please provide your comments and suggestions regarding this paper.
Particular attention should be given to details that guide possible revisions or explain reasons for rejection.