
January 2006
Some Aspects of Russian Telecommunications
By Nikolay Sokolov, Research Institute of Telecommunications, St.
Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
Two articles under the same title, "Telecommunications in Russia,"
were published in IEEE Communications Magazine in 1992 and
2000, respectively [1, 2]. From the beginning of this century Russian
telecommunications has undergone significant changes. Some of them
related to mobile networks and Internet are briefly described in this
article.
Introduction
Formerly, an acceptable measure of telecommunications evolution on
the whole was the modernization level of the national public switched
telephone network (PSTN). Nowadays, a similar approach is impossible.
In particular, mobile communications up to 2000 was embryonic. Right
now mobile operators are considered the main players in the telecom
market.
Internet Protocol (IP) applications are examples of the next
important tendency in Russian telecommunication evolution. Primarily,
Internet and voice over IP (VoIP) services are of interest.
This article consists of two parts, excluding "Conclusions" and
"References." The first part deals with statistics. Some tables and
diagrams present the evolution of the Russian telecommunications.
There are three subsections in the second part of the article.
Milestone events in evolution related to fixed telephony, mobile
communications, and the Internet are described.Statistics
Table
1. Telecommunications statistics.
|
Indices |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
| Domestic and international long-distance (ILD/DLD)
calls, number per inhabitant |
26.8 |
35.6 |
40.8 |
45.1 |
| Telegrams,
number per inhabitant |
0.34 |
0.33 |
0.29 |
0.24 |
| Fixed telephony penetration, % |
24.1 |
25.4 |
26.6 |
28.4 |
| Mobile communication penetration, % |
5.3 |
12.3 |
24.7 |
51.5 |
| Internet penetration, % |
3.2 |
5.6 |
8.3 |
12.9 |
|
Table 1 presents the main telecommunication statistics. This table
was compiled on the basis of information published by state
structures and regional telecommunications operators [35].
ILD/DLD refers to all types of connections established with a
subscriber located outside the given city or rural district. The
portion of international calls is less than 10 percent. About
two-thirds of international calls are established to subscribers in
the Commonwealth of Independent States. ILD/DLD traffic continues to
grow. On the contrary, telegraph traffic shows permanent decline.
Three curves related to penetration are shown in Figure 1. The rate
of growth related to mobile communications was unexpected. It is not
inconceivable that the curve shown presents too optimistic an
estimation of the mobile market. This problem is discussed later.
Growth of fixed communications was expected. Reliable estimation of
the Internet market is very complicated. Some considerations
concerning this vital issue are presented later.
Figure 1. Market penetration.
|
|
Table
2. Statistics for the first quarter, 2005 and 2004.
|
Indices |
1st quarter, 2005 |
1st quarter, 2004 |
| ILD/DLD calls, mln. hours |
69.6 |
100.2% |
| Including international calls,
mln. hours |
4.8 |
97.7% |
| Telegrams, mln. |
7.7 |
85.6% |
| Including international
telegrams, mln. |
0.3 |
92.1% |
|
Some statistics related to the first quarter of two years are given
in Table 2. Probably, the growth process of ILD/DLD calls is
approaching saturation. The portion of international traffic has been
slightly reduced. Total telegraph traffic has confirmed its tendency
to decrease. However, this process is slower for international
telegrams.
Revenues from different services are significant indicators for
operators. For this reason, a revenue structure allows the optimal
company policy to be defined. In the Russian telecom market, Moscow
plays an important role. From the beginning, many new services have
been introduced by metropolitan operators.
The revenue structure for the Moscow telecom market is given in
Figure 2. These data were determined for the first quarter of 2005.
Undoubtedly, mobile communications is a very attractive segment of
business. On the other hand, low revenues generated by intelligent
network (IN) services, integrated services digital network (ISDN),
and pay phones were unexpected.
Micro distribution of the main types of telephone traffic is
interesting. The situation is food for thought. It must be emphasized
that narrative traffic consists of three main components. The sources
of this traffic are the telegraph network, data transmission systems,
and Internet. Broadcast revenues are some of the incomes generated by
all services related to television and sound systems.
Figure 2. Revenue structure for the Moscow
telecom market, first quarter 2005.
|
|
Evolutions
Fixed Telephony
It is interesting to glance over the forecasts made near 10 years ago
for the Russian PSTN. Most predictors had expected a capacity
explosion. Nevertheless, fixed telephony market grew slowly. There
are three main reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, investment
opportunities were limited. In the second place, IP technologies have
led to recession in demand for the traditional PSTN. Finally, mobile
communications affect fixed telephony.
The last reason is well known. However, at least one aspect is very
important for the Russian telecom market. The connection fee of the
Russian PSTN exceeds $200. A potential subscriber of PSTN has to
solve a simple problem: what is to be done? The first solution is as
followis:
- Buy a terminal (the cost of ordinary telephone set is
about $10),
- Pay the connection fee established by the operator (more
than $200).
- Pay monthly for local service (e.g., in St. Petersburg,
the applicable rate is approximately US$6 regardless of local traffic
volume).
- Pay for ILD/DLD calls and value added services in
compliance with the tariff established by the PSTN operator.
On the other hand, a subscriber may choose a different solution. This
solution will be based on the following:
- Buy a cell phone (the cost of an unsophisticated terminal
telephone set is about $70).
- Pay connection fee established by operator (in some cases $0).
- Pay every month for services (this value depends on the
tariff system, but it is possible to choose a free of charge
scheme).
- Pay for local traffic (e.g., in summer 2005, one mobile
operator established a price of $0.02/min).
- Pay for ILD/DLD calls and value added services in
compliance with the tariff established by the mobile operator.
These considerations allow one to see the simple inequation in
optimal solution choice. In many cases the second solution, based on
connection to a mobile network, is more attractive. It is
anestablished fac that potential subscribers from the waiting list
have turned down a proposal to connect to the PSTN. Therefore, fixed
telephony players (mainly PSTN operators) must revise their financial
and technical policies.
Mobile Communications
In major publications, euphoria is the leitmotif for mobile market
development in Russia. There is no doubt that the announced number of
connected terminals has permanently increased. On the other hand,
counting subscribers was substituted by recapitulation of sold SIM
cards. As a result, a significant difference showed up in a public
opinion poll.
Figure 3. Two estimates of the Russian mobile
market.
|
|
In 2005 the well-known national Levada Center [6] published a
report related to mobile market estimations. There is essential
contradiction between statistics presented by mobile operators and
the Levada Center results. Figure 3 illustrates this clearly seen
distinction.
Growth of the Russian mobile market is accompanied by decrease in the
average revenue per user (ARPU). In 2004 ARPU was $11.9 [7]. It was
21 percent lower than ARPU calculated in 2003. There is noticeable
variance in ARPU throughout all federal districts. Information
published by iKS-Consulting [7] is reproduced in Fig. 4. Two
estimations are given for each district: ARPU per month in U.S.
dollars/value of annual income (in millions of the USA dollars).
Indicated data correspond to 2004.
All mobile operators try to raise ARPU. First, they pin their hopes
to mobile content. According to a prediction published by
RosBusinessConsulting [8], total income of mobile operators in Russia
would increase to $11.5 billion in 2005. At the same time, many
experts consider that in 2005 the number of mobile subscribers would
exceed 100 million. In this case ARPU will go lower than $10.
Internet
In the middle of 2005, the Internet market was estimated at 18
million users. Moscow's users were approximately 20 percent of these.
This information was published by the fund Public Opinion. Evidently,
it is very difficult to receive reliable data. There are relatively
easy methods to calculate with needed accuracy the number of
subscribers for PSTNs and mobile networks. These methods are based on
quantity of sold numbers or SIM cards, respectively. IP addressing is
not suited to calculation of users. Number of used personal computers
does not allow us to estimate the Internet market as well.
For these reasons, it is necessary to estimate Internet and
information technology (IT) markets using other indices. Possible
candidates are traffic, number of sites, and income. At present,
objective methods for analysis of the Internet and IT markets are
elaborated.
At the beginning of 2005, according to a survey carried out by J'son
& Partners and VoxRu.Net, dialup remained the leader in means of
home acces. Two-thirds of home users had dialup access. Less than 4
percent of users had installed asynchronous digital subscriber line
(ADSL) equipment. Home networks usually based on Ethernet standards
provided access for nearly 20 percent of Internet users.
An important application of IP technology is as an effective tool for
speech traffic service. At present, VoIP solutions are widely used
for ILD/DLD traffic. By a rough estimate, every 10th ILD/DLD
connection is established using VoIP equipment. In some cases the
variation of prices between the PSTN and VoIP network is exponential.
On the other hand, the quality of speech transmission does not always
comply with subscriber demands.
Generally IT is associated with the Internet. On the other hand, some
directions of IT are considered independent business. A typical
example is software design. Russia is going to essentially increase
export of its software. At the end of 2004, the Minister of
Information Technologies and Communications held a press conference.
He estimated the annual income generated by IT services to be $8
billion.
Research holding ROMIR Monitoring [9] has carried out a survey
related to Internet service expenses. It appeared that only 9 percent
of Russians spend more than $35 for the Internet. The expenses of 33
percent of users lay in a range from S10.5 to $21.
The main direction of further evolution is the creation of so-called
IT parks. These will have status similar to a special economic area
established to boost investment in modern technologies. IT parks are
an ambitious plan with a view to build up our own "Silicon
Valleys."
Conclusions
Analysis presented in [1] made it clear that Russian
telecommunications did not correspond to the main demands of
customers. All players of the telecom market by common effor have
changed the level of national telecommunications. Nowadays, most of
the problems mentioned above have been solved. However, new problems
have appeared. Analysis of the proposed decisions will be the subject
of the next article.References
[1] N. Sokolov, "Telecommunications in Russia," IEEE Commun.
Mag., vol. 30, no. 7, July 1992, pp. 6670.
[2] N. Sokolov and B. Goldstein, "Telecommunications in Russia,"
IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 38, no. 8, Aug. 2000, pp.
10611.
[3] http://www.minsvyaz.ru
[4] http://www.gks.ru
[5] http://www.svyazinvest.ru
[6] http://www.levada.ru
[7] http://www.iks-consulting.ru
[8] http://www.rbc.ru
[9] http://www.monitoring.ru
Biography
NIKOLAY SOKOLOV received a Ph.D. degree in electrical
communications from St. Petersburg Telecommunication University in
1982. He joined the Research and Development Centre of
Telecommunications (LONIIS) in 1974. Currently, he is a senior member
of scientific staff. He is also a part-time professor at St.
Petersburg Telecommunication University. His research interests are
in the field of telecommunication evolution and network planning. In
1995 and 2000 he was the Guest Editor of Feature Topics published in
IEEE Communications Magazine. He is the author of three books.
Figure 4. APPU per month and annual income for
all federal districts.
|
|
Report on the TELSIKS 2005 Conference
Prof. Bratislav Milovanovic,TELSIKS 2005 Chairman
The series of biennial conferences on telecommunications in modern
satellite, cable and broadcasting services called "TELSIKS" started
12 years ago at the Faculty of Electronic Engineering in Nis, Serbia
and Montenegro. This year's conference, TELSIKS 2005, was the 7th in
series and it was held from 28 to 30 September 2005 in Nis, Serbia
& Montenegro. As earlier, it was organized by the Faculty of
Electronic Engineering under the technical co-sponsorship of the IEEE
MTT-Society, Communications Society, AP-Society and IEEE Region 8,
and in co-operation with IEEE Section, MTT Chapter and Communications
Chapter of Serbia and Montenegro.
Around 190 papers were submitted to the conference, covering a wide
range of topics. Each paper within the contributed papers category
was reviewed by at least three members of International Review Board.
Finally, the conference program comprised 135 papers, of which 15
were invited ones. The authors of papers are from nearly 30 different
countries over all 5 continents. All accepted contributed and invited
papers were published prior to the conference. The Conference
Proceedings will be distributed as an IEEE publication (Book Broker
Post-conference Distribution Program). All conference papers will be
available on IEEEXplore web site, as well as in IEE INSPEC database.
TELSIKS 2005 started on Wednesday, September 28, with an Opening
Ceremony. After that, Prof. Jan Zehentner from Czech Technical
University in Prague, IEEE Region 8 MTT-S Chapter Coordinator,
presented an invited plenary speech called: "Planar Tranmission Lines
in MW and MMW Circuits".
During the three conference days, the papers were presented within 12
parallel oral sessions and 6 poster sessions. In addition, the
technical program included two workshops and a round table. The first
workshop was related to the Advances in Mobile Communication
Technologies and the speakers were Prof. Branko Kolundzija, Prof.
Liljana Gavrilovska and Prof. Yiannis Vardaxoglou. The second
workshop was oriented to actual topics in Broadband Wireless
Communications and the lecturers were the leading domestic experts.
Several additional events (commercial presentations, journal
presentations, meetings etc.) took place as well.
The social program was rich as always and included a welcome
cocktail, a nice musical performance, a guided sightseeing tour, a
reception at the Mayor of Nis and a conference banquet. TELSIKS 2005
gathered many people that work in the field of telecommunications and
it was a good opportunity for many contacts. It has been evaluated as
a leading scientific conference in the field of modern
telecommunication technologies in South-eastern Europe. In addition,
the participants have emphasized that they enjoyed a very pleasant
atmosphere and outstanding hospitality during the conference.