The responsibilities included as part of being the TCCC Representative
at YOUR_CONFERENCE are:
- Attend scheduled TPC meetings when and where they take place.
- Take as active a role as possible in promoting topics of interest to
TCCC in the context of YOUR_CONFERENCE. This can typically consists
of:
- Proposed "hot topics" for panels and/or special sessions as well as
tutorials.
- Identify qualified "experts" and enroll their participation to help
promote quality panels, special sessions, and tutorials on topics of
interest to TCCC.
- Actively solicit good papers in areas of relevance to TCCC,
especially emerging ones.
- Handling of paper submissions and general TPC member
responsibilities. The first and maybe most important aspect is to
ensure that all papers submitted to YOUR_CONFERENCE and on topics of
relevance to TCCC are properly routed to you. The first step is to make
sure that the call for papers clearly identifies that authors should
indicate a general area for their paper, and that TCCC is explicitly
listed as one of the candidate areas. However, this is typically not
enough and papers often get misrouted to other committees, either
because the authors forgot to list an area, or because of some error.
It is, therefore, important to closely track any potential candidate
paper and regularly review the list of papers assigned to other areas.
Conversely, if you get papers which are clearly outside the scope of
TCCC, you should forward them to the appropriate TPC for that area. In
the case of papers that can fit in multiple areas, the best way to
handle such situations and avoid frictions, is to suggest joint sessions
with other committees. This may be the case for areas such as wireless,
multimedia, etc.
- Identify suitable reviewers for all the papers you have been
assigned. We can certainly help you with that process and suggest
names, but you are also encouraged to draw on your own circle of
colleagues as this helps broaden the reviewers' population we need to
tap in. Obviously, this should be done with quality as the main
criterion.
- Participate in the paper acceptance process to ensure that TCCC
papers are of high quality, but also are not penalized by a review
process more stringent than that used by other TPCs. Ideally, you want
to have many accepted high quality papers, but the situation is often
not that simple and you will have to exercise your judgement to decide
which ones to push during the final phases of the TPC review process. A
"good" general rule is that you may want to promote more strongly papers
that are in new emerging areas we are trying to grow, than those that
are in more mature areas. If in doubt about the importance of a
particular topic, feel free to consult any of the TCCC officers. Also, as a rule, having
pre-identified sessions with their titles and all the accepted papers in
each of them, can be very helpful in ensuring that you get the kind of
coverage and acceptance rate you seek. In general, the better prepared
you are in figuring out where each paper should go, the better your
chance of success.
- Session organization is the last but nevertheless important step of
the paper handling process. As mentioned above, the ideal situation is
when you have been able to group all your "accepted" papers (those you
want to recommend for acceptance), into full sessions. In practice, you
may not be able to do that for all your papers, and you have then to
figure out how to handle them. One option mentioned earlier is that of
joint sessions with other committees, and again you can maximize your
chances of success there by trying to arrange that ahead of time. In
general, the goal is to ensure that TCCC is well represented in terms of
number of accepted papers and coverage of its sessions.
You may want to also contact some of the TCCC conf reps for other
conferences and ask them to share their experience with you. This may
give you a more practical idea on how things happen. Their names and
how to contact them are listed on the TCCC web
page.
Last modified: 02-07-2002
Please send any corrections and suggestions to:
Miguel A. Labrador